Two: Believe

Part Two in a super-elongated series – an assignment to myself  “to start laying out what I believe God asks of us – first individually, then corporately as churches”. Here’s where we are:

  • One: Repent.
  • Two: Believe

Since One was “repent”, I think I should. I have neglected blogging (this is bad for me, not for you necessarily). I am trying to be more disciplined in weekly schedules and such. The advent of a new baby on the way and some big work projects (plus summer in general) have held me up a bit. To repent is to turn from your current path, so my deeds showing my repentance will be blogging in nature…

The second thing I think God asks of use is to believe. And I think these may be in reversed order. Maybe you have to believe first, otherwise repentance is fairly hollow. You don’t have to repent if you don’t believe in moral authority. If “The fear of the LORD is the beginning of wisdom,” then acknowledging God exists has to be the starting point of our approach to Him.

And that’s the real issue, isn’t it? God seems to have made a frustrating decision to base most of our interactions with Him on faith alone – not observable, provable, scientific-y stuff. “Why for?” you may ask (and I have done so many times).

One: Repent

I have been meditating on that last assignment I gave myself – “to start laying out what I believe God asks of us – first individually, then corporately as churches”. A tall order indeed – and what follows will be some opening salvos. I am hoping maybe a few of you lurkers will be tempted to give me your two cents worth – I know I always need to grow and be challenged…

I think one of the first things we are asked to do in the Bible is repent. God’s words to us often begin with an invitation to change our course and a promise of restoration, redemption, and reconciliation (hey ma – I used a big word!). 

Don’t Be So Certain…

This is really an addendum to my last post. In the book I read, Casper the Atheist consistently repeats what has become the mantra of post-modern thought – being certain of anything outside that which is provable by the scientific method is arrogant, ignorant, and offensive. Here’s how he put it:

“Certainty is boring. Certainty is closed off. Certainty is against new information. Certainty is a kind of orthodoxy, really, and it was those kinds of ‘certainty’ moments – when I would hear a pastor or others in a church declare themselves absolutely certain of heaven, God’s existence, truth – that I would get a little riled. Because being absolutely certain about something you cannot prove is simply dogma, and dogmatism is the death of ideas, and I like ideas.”

Don’t Attend Church.

Full disclosure – I really mean don’t “just” attend church. I think. This may be a long one…

First off, I am the world’s worst blogger. Promised a post Tuesday, getting to it late at night on Saturday. Lots of excuses – work, family stuff, an unexpected funeral to attend (are they ever really expected?). Blah blah blah. Of course, that would matter tremendously if anyone actually READ this thing. I think I can humbly ask the three of you I pay to check my spelling and grammar for your forgiveness and I’m in the clear.

The most signifigant delay this week was meeting up with a friend who is a pastor for coffee. During that conversation, he recommended a book called “Jim & Casper Go to Church“, which I promptly ordered from Amazon. I picked “slow boat from China” shipping since it was free and I’m cheap, but it came like the next day. And I started reading the first chapter. And then I realized I needed to finish the sucker before I wrote this next part. Three hours later (don’t be impressed – it’s not a big book and the words are mostly pretty small), I have completed it and HAVE to write RIGHT NOW!!Â